Harpsichord: Huguette Dreyfus
Big C Reviews the Ships of SWTOR. Corellian XS Light Freighter up first Facebook: www.facebook.com JustinTV: www.justin.tv/bigcisftw
Video Rating: 4 / 5
22 diciembre, 2012
Harpsichord: Huguette Dreyfus
Big C Reviews the Ships of SWTOR. Corellian XS Light Freighter up first Facebook: www.facebook.com JustinTV: www.justin.tv/bigcisftw
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Copyright © 2010 · Triunfa en Red · Todos los Derechos Reservados
39 Comments
ariyakantasila
22 diciembre, 2012hilarious…I thought only pop music fans insulted each other in youtube comments. I WAS WRONG
leesm0821
22 diciembre, 2012Then he is a tomfool orjackanapes
dziady1
22 diciembre, 2012cont:Can’t speak for Dreyfus – who seems all over the map . The Durand edition is very basic and does not include all the tampering frills . Manfredo Kraemer is a violinist
to hear in this ,
being study in bowing techniques which he does wonderfully well .This music can be played as originally written .Being «in situ» it shows its true beauty and the historical advancement of the art .
Otherwise all ends up as this recent tampering adventure of a stupid woman and the ruining of a fresco.
dziady1
22 diciembre, 2012My original point was that some 250 odd years after the work is published along comes a 20 Cent. fiddle player and throws in romantic schmaltz and calls it the Corelli La Folia.
Of all the arts only in music it seems is it fair game to pillage and alter to suit ones taste
and then pass it off in performance as representing the true work .Of all the research
given this work to do what this fiddler does is «non thinking » and stupid no matter
how celebrated a performer he may be to some people .
Cor Elly
22 diciembre, 2012DZIADY1
We recently exchanged a few thoughts on great violinists of the past. Szeryng is of the same generation as Neveu, but was not in your preferred list. Leaving aside Nick.Osia’s irony, a few questions come to mind :
whose interpretation of the Corelli would you recommend ?
what is the interest of the Durand edition ?
would not Dreyfus have played directly from the original, if the aim were to be stylistically accurate ?
can (or should) this music really be played «as written» ?
Bach Tobach
22 diciembre, 2012@leesm0821
If you have a few minutes to spare, read back through the discussion, starting with dziady1 calling Henryk Szeryng a „non thinking fiddle player» about 3 weeks ago. It’s not easy to follow, with a lot of multiple postings, but see what you think !
leesm0821
22 diciembre, 2012hm…. lots of conversation going down?
Nick Osia
22 diciembre, 2012And so, as the gibbering, battered remains of DZIADY1 are scraped from the floor and transported back to his padded cell, where he can be heard blubbering incoherently about acolytes and mice, we are pleased to announce that, in recognition of his devotion to musical ignorance, boorish arrogance and inability to understand simple English, DZIADY1 has been voted winner of our coveted «GORMLESS IDIOT OF THE YEAR» award, 2012.
dziady1
22 diciembre, 2012I replied to you because I found you mildly amusing -there is no discussion to
be had with zurich geige as he is to me a mediocre bore , but perhaps not to you ..
That you find him «simply right » is well and good for you at the same
time your persistence that I challenge him to prove him» wrong » is indeed
strange .No way for an acolyte to behave .With this latest you have passed being amusing.Stay with zurich you deserve each other .
Nick Osia
22 diciembre, 2012[continued from below]
… and I have not failed to notice that you still reply to me and are too cowardly to re-enter a musical discussion with zurich.geige. You haven’t even got the guts to put forward some sort of counter-argument.
Try telling him where he’s wrong about the Léonard arrangement, or about the Berlioz quotation (which you, not he, introduced). But give some musical arguments. He does – and it appears as easy to him as it is impossible for you.
Nick Osia
22 diciembre, 2012I do not need to think zurich.geige’s answer «clever». It is simply right. He states clear facts which can be verified.
If, as you claim, he does not answer the question, but «dances around», then how is it you cannot produce even the most meagre shred of evidence to support your claim ?
Which, of course, is the point of Andersen’s story. But even that appears to be beyond your comprehension.
dziady1
23 diciembre, 2012Is seemingly being an idiot a studied pose with you ?
The Berlioz question was not answered ,it was danced around in a manner
that was thought as clever -but unfortunately not as clever as you might think . You are beyond understanding what someone may think
of you and your manny inane comments. No insults aimed at you , just observations .In reading the exchanges of geige,ulrich, tobach one cannot but notice how they reflect the superb story of the emperor and his new clothes .
Nick Osia
23 diciembre, 2012Dziady1, I can understand you wanting to slink off after receiving such a thrashing – it is a natural reaction of the weak when humiliated.
Zurich.geige has answered the Berlioz question for you ; why it is irrelevant to 18th century performance practice, but how it relates to this 19th century arrangement. From the moment I made a remark about «scores», you saw your opportunity to wriggle out of the musical discussion and concentrate on aiming your primitive insults at me.
zurich geige
23 diciembre, 2012Quite right. Editions based closely on the original (Rome c.1700) for violin & figured bass, continued to appear until the late 18th century. Léonard’s arrangement reflects a radical change of approach in the 19th century. Dolmetsch tries to give a practical edition, adding indications deemed „necessary» for interpretation as well as a continuo realisation suitable for piano. The Joachim/Chrysander is a scholarly text from which few 19th century musicians would actually be able to play.
Nick Osia
23 diciembre, 2012I’m not sure where that leaves the scores, except that dziady1 is still firmly stuck on NIL and looking more & more feeble by the minute.
Bach Tobach
23 diciembre, 2012Looking at the dates of those editions makes the «old» Joachim/Chrysander (almost exactly contemporary with the Dolmetsch) seem all the more remarkable.
It also makes dziady1’s simplistic view of musical history seem all the more grotesque.
zurich geige
23 diciembre, 2012Absolutely. It is sad to note that in his frenetic efforts to denigrate anyone who contradicts him, dziady1 completely misses the potential significance of his own remark.
By Berlioz’s time, musicians expected to have very clear indications on their scores (tempo, phrasing, dynamics etc). The composer could indeed ask his musicians to play „as written». Léonard, only 15 younger than Berlioz, would have been brought up in this tradition. contd
zurich geige
23 diciembre, 2012contd. For most players of Léonard’s generation, 18th century editions would be largely unusable – precisely because you CAN’T play them „as written» : figured bass, few dynamics or phrase markings… So he prepared a score as Berlioz would have expected, with a fully written-out accompaniment (for piano), and extensive expression indications – all to be played „as written». In the event he went much further, making it (to use dziady1’s term) „his own».
jorgen ulrich
23 diciembre, 2012So in a sense, you could say that Szeryng is doing as Berlioz requested : playing it «as written» (in the Léonard edition).
zurich geige
23 diciembre, 2012Happy memories !
Pity the Szeryng/Corelli comments got bogged down with dziady’s habitual insults in place of discussion. What we hear goes far beyond dziady’s „dumb fiddler» routine. This is, of course, the 19th century arrangement (for violin & piano) by Hubert Léonard, a wonderful glimpse of how baroque music was seen 150 years ago, with its chromatic embellishments and cadenza… The score even proposes a „more effective» ending, which Szeryng & Dreyfus choose not to include ! contd.
zurich geige
23 diciembre, 2012contd. The arrangement dates from long before the modern „early music» revival, and it is extraordinary to find this recording, over a century later, by a great romantic violinist with harpsichord (Dreyfus more or less sticks to Léonard’s „piano» part!)
A comparison with the late 1880s edition (also for violin & piano) by the baroque pioneer Arnold Dolmetsch makes the journey towards 20th century „historically informed» interpretations all the more fascinating.
Nick Osia
23 diciembre, 2012Good try – but another failure.
Once again, I see you have abandoned any pretence at musical discussion (it never lasts long before you bring out the «ignorant» or «you are too stupid to understand»).
Zurich.geige certainly kept it simple ; but not simple enough for you. We’re still waiting for your answer to the Bach/Mozart question.
I know you’ll not answer. Perhaps you’ll spin some ludicrous story about your superior intelligence – but the truth is a plain as can be : you are incapable.
dziady1
23 diciembre, 2012You are totally unfair in implying that I poke fun at you .
Nick Osia
23 diciembre, 2012What’s all this talk about performance practice? – ornamentation, pitch, tuning… Does nobody care that dziady1 is having problems with mice? They distract him as he looks down from on high to poke fun at the ignorant.
Bach Tobach
23 diciembre, 2012This is amazing ! I was a young student at that colloquium and am now a professional early musician. That zurich.geige is able to appreciate Szeryng’s Corelli on its own terms is no surprise. I remember a scholar & performer committed to historical practice (there was a vivid illustration of different pitches & temperaments in baroque music) yet able to present different viewpoints with scholarly impartiality. Musicianship of Szeryng’s calibre is simply wonderful.
magget150
23 diciembre, 2012I bought the super expensive version (Collectors Edition) and it didn’t contain a product registration Key so now i am fucked and spent 161$ for NOTHING. Customer service is a joke.
VeryCupboardy
23 diciembre, 2012hey i never played wow and this is one of my first MMO’s. should i go on a pvp server. from what i have gathered a pvp server is like open world stuff where if you see an imp you can shoot him. is this the case and does it generate more lag just being on the server.
TheZacula
23 diciembre, 2012Hmmm… this ship says ONE thing to me…
«We watched the Original trilogy of Star Wars and Firefly. We decided to just kinda mesh those two together. Do you like it?»
Of course, the only thing a true gentlemen can say to such a thing is HELL YEAH I LIKE IT!
Casey Worrall
23 diciembre, 2012@BigCisFTW Hey C when the game launches and we all join our little erp server to have mas sex can you and towliee stay the fuck away so a million retarded faggots dont bomb our server? Thanks in advanced
BigCisFTW
23 diciembre, 2012me too, what should I rate it? I dunno wtf the ratings mean, lol.
averagehomie123
23 diciembre, 2012@BigCisFTW im disappointed rated tv y come on dude u could do better.
TheGnomophobe
23 diciembre, 2012If u made a book how to be awsome like u I would buy it
ghjklooo1234
23 diciembre, 2012is this now an Open-beta?
Vleesball
23 diciembre, 2012bigC ock u got a purple dick?
TheGamingAbyss
23 diciembre, 2012WHY CAN’T IT COME OUT NOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
BigCisFTW
23 diciembre, 2012I agree!!!
lockard34
23 diciembre, 2012Looks awesome!
BigCisFTW
23 diciembre, 2012ugetta win 🙂
izskilzix
23 diciembre, 2012CANT RESIST… FIRST